PRINCIPAL TRADEMARK REGISTER
The US Patent and Trademark
Office maintains two registers for trademarks. There is the Principal Trademark
Register (which is where you want to be). There is also the Supplemental
Trademark Register. Registration on ether register entitles the owner to place
the ® symbol immediately after the mark, i.e., Kodak® camera.
To be eligible for registration
on the Principal Trademark Register, the mark must be distinctive. This topic
is discussed in Trademarks.
The term of a trademark
registered on the Principal Register after November 16, 1989 is for an initial
term of 10 years. However an affidavit (so called Section 8 and 15 affidavit)
must be filed within the first six years to confirm the mark is still in use.
The trademark can be renewed for additional 10-year terms by filing a “Section
9 affidavit.”
Why do you want your mark
registered on the Principal Trademark Register? The process is expensive. The
current filing fee is $325.00 for each mark per classification of goods or
services. (Assume that if you intend the mark for multiple products and
services, you will be paying for multiple classification.) The filing of a
trademark application is relatively straight forward and there are self
help books that describe the process in detail. If the application is initially
rejected, which is not uncommon, the process becomes more complex. The process
is also somewhat lengthy, i.e., 1 to 2 plus years.
Registration on the Principal
Register conveys the following rights:
·
Presumption of
ownership.
·
The exclusive right
to use the mark throughout the US (subject only to the prior right of an entity,
if any, that was using the mark in a particular locality at the time you
registered your mark).
·
Right to bring an
action to enforce trademark rights in Federal Court.
·
Right to receive
treble damages.
·
After 5 years of
registration, the mark is deemed in contestable. (In most cases, this means the
mark is not subject to a petition for cancellation filed by a third party in the
USPTO.)
Registration of a trademark that
is also used as a domain name enhances your claim of ownership of the domain
name.
It is worth noting that the US
trademark laws provided additional protection for “famous mark”. The owner of a
famous mark is entitled to stop (“enjoin”) the use of similar marks even if
there is no possibility that consumers will be confused as to the origin of the
goods or services. In contrast, a showing of a likelihood of confusion in the
minds of consumers as to the origin of the goods is required to enjoin or stop
the use of a similar trademark not meeting the criteria of a famous mark.
Fair Use: As an exception to the
trademark owner’s exclusive right to use the mark in the relevant market, the
doctrine of fair use permits others to use the mark. Examples of permitted
“fair use” include parodies or similar humorous use of the mark, use of the mark
in comparative advertising, and news accounts. Another important category of
permitted fair use of a trademark owned by another is in advertisements of a
third party merchant stating that it offers goods or services subject of the
mark.
Incontestability of marks: A
trademark becomes immune to legal challenge after being registered on the USPTO
Principal Register for five years. This is subject to the article 8 and 15
affidavits (discussed above) having been filed, that there has been no ruling
that the mark is invalid and there is no challenge pending. Further, the
trademark owner must be able to show that the mark has not become generic, i.e.,
that it now commonly used to describe an entire class of products or services,
and not just the products and services of the trademark owner. (“Escalator” is
an example of a trademark that has become generic. “Xerox” and “Kleenex” are
examples of trademarks that, for a time, had come in danger of being generic due
to the widespread use by the public in describing the entire class of services
or products, i.e., photocopying and facial tissue.)
Trademarks and Internet Domain
Names: Note that the registration of trademarks has taken added significance
with the advent of Internet domain names. There are often multiple companies
operating with similar names or similar product names but in different markets
or fields of commerce. There is however, only one possible registrant each for
the top level domain (TLD) “.com”, etc. This has caused domain names
incorporating the trademarks or service marks of major companies to become
valuable commodities. Instances of people registering of domain names of
companies or organizations in the belief that they will be able to resell the
domain name to the company at a high profit have been well publicized. This has
resulted in the term “cyber-squatter” being coined. See
Cyber Squatting. However, recent federal legislation and court
decisions are making it increasing clear that cyber-squatting will not be
permitted. An entity that can show an established use of a name, such as via a
registered trademark, can block the cyber-squatter from attempting to use the
name, or to hold the name for ransom to a legitimate user of the name. See also
Trademarking Domain Names.
One of the tools that the courts
have utilized in protecting the rights of owners of trademarks or well known
names from the speculative acquisition of domain names incorporating the
trademarks or names is the non-dilution provisions of the Lanham Act discussed
above.
|