Stolen Invention! UPDATE

  Introduction: I very recently published a post entitled Stolen Invention!  The post discusses the USPTO Derivation Proceedings.  Derivation Proceedings are the mechanism for invention ownership dispute resolution between conflicting parties are resolved.  My post urged two things: First, I recommended patience if you are unfortunate and have to initiate such an action and second,…

Read More →

Stolen Invention!

  Introduction: Derivation Proceeding:  You conceive of a new invention.  You disclose it to a trusted party.  Perhaps the trusted party helped you on the invention.  You belatedly find out the trusted third party filed a patent application on the invention without listing you as an inventor.  A stolen invention.  What do you do?  …

Read More →

Post Patent Grant Challenge

INTRODUCTION: After you have achieved the award of a patent, you may still be subject to challenge from competitors.  You may face a post patent grant challenge.  Part of the America Invents Act or AIA the USPTO established a procedure called a Post Grant Review.  The procedure gives third parties up to 9 months after the grant of…

Read More →

Appealing an Obviousness Rejection

INTRODUCTION: This article looks at appealing an obviousness rejection. It should not be a surprise that there are obstinate patent examiners.  For whatever reason, they can be determined to not allow your patent application.  Frequently, this situation can be experienced when an examiner rejects your application based on alleged obviousness (a 103 rejection).   An assertion of obviousness…

Read More →

When is Computer Software Patentable?

Software is patentable when and if it can meet the following two part test: Does the claim recite (expressly state or inherently infer) that the software pertains to a method of organizing human activity (including satisfying legal obligations), mathematical formulas or mental processes?  If no, then the software claim is patent eligible.  If yes, then go to the second part…

Read More →

Patenting Software – Another Wrinkle

Introduction If you have followed my past postings, you will know I am often trying to explain issues involved in patenting software or computer business methods.  Much of the controversy of the last several years has been whether the software or business method is actually patentable subject matter.  This has involved discussions of Section 101 and whether…

Read More →

APPEALING THE EXAMINER REJECTION

Introduction I recently published a blog regarding the frustrating but common rejection of a patent application based upon the examiner asserting that the invention is obvious.  See  Overcoming an Obviousness Rejection.  Depending upon the individual circumstances, it may be worthwhile for appealing the examiner rejection.   Recall obviousness under 35 U.S.C. section 103 can be a subjective exercise or…

Read More →