What’s Up Federal Circuit

Below is a post from Patent Attorney Gene Quinn, author of the blog IPWatchdog.com. Gene is complaining of the same topic of my Friday post entitled “Known Technology is Not Abstract” and regarding the absurd position of the several Federal Circuit Justices asserting inclusion of an “abstract idea” within a patent claim as defeating patent…

Read More →

Known Technology is not Abstract

Introduction Abstract ideas are not patentable.  This is simple statement has caused continued confusion and frustration.  The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled that a garage door opening device that differs from the prior art only in that it utilizes “off the self” wireless communicating technology is an abstract idea.  Use of known technical devices…

Read More →

WHAT IS A PATENT?

Introduction What is a patent?  Simply stated, a patent is the exclusive right to prevent others from making, using or selling the invention or things made using the invention. Surprising?  See the following discussion. Discussion Technically, a patent does NOT give you the right to make use or sell the products of your invention since…

Read More →

PATENT APPLICATION FLOW CHART

  Introduction The following is a simplified description on one possible chain of events that occur in the patenting process.  This is a hypothetical patent application flow chart.  See my article on “Behind the First to File Rules“.  Also review my article regarding “Patent Application Elements“. Pre-Filing Outline Document invention in writing, signed and dated…

Read More →

Clarifying What are Patent Ineligible Abstract Ideas

Introduction: Intertwined with the long ambiguity of the scope of patent eligible software has been the difficulty in defining what are patent ineligible “abstract ideas”.  Recall 35 U.S.C. Section 101 states that all things invented by man are patentable subject matter except laws of nature, natural phenomena or abstract ideas.  These three items are referred to below as…

Read More →

Review of CBM Procedure

Introduction I very recently wrote an article regarding the use of the Covered Business Method review procedure created under the AIA of 2012.  The Covered Business Method review procedure is a powerful tool that can be used to challenge an issued patent that pertains to a business method.  See Junk Patents and Covered Business Methods.  The…

Read More →

PATENTS FOR BUSINESS METHODS (REVISED)

Introduction Methods of conducting business can be patentable.  However, the USPTO inquiry expands beyond the questions of whether the method is new (Section 102) or whether the method is an obvious variation of prior art methods (Section 103).  Further, the pendency for examination of business method applications is the longest within the USPTO.  Also see…

Read More →

Current Inter Partes Review

Introduction First, the AIA revised the prior Inter Partes Review practice discussed in an earlier blog. This blog pertains only to the new practice (post AIA).  You may also want to review my blog “Challenges to your Patent” Discussion Inter Partes Review can only be initiated after 9 months for the patent grant.  This is consistent with the 9 month…

Read More →

Monetizing Your Idea

Introduction Good ideas can have great value.  However monetizing your idea by transforming into property that can be sold or licensed is problematic.  It will be appreciated that sales and licensing of patents are the common ways to document valuable ideas that can be transform into cash.  How can an idea be converted into a patent?  What is required…

Read More →

PATENTABLE INVENTION

Introduction As mentioned in Patent Application Elements, a development must be novel, useful and non-obvious to persons skilled or knowledgeable in the applicable technology or art.  The following descriptor the elements of a patentable invention. Novelty To comply with the requirement that the development be novel, the invention must not have been known or used…

Read More →