Patent Classification Review

Introduction Crafting the specification, and particularly the claims, of a patent application can be critical to the chances of ultimate allowance of the application into a legally enforceable patent.  This applies not only to distinguishing your invention over the prior art or confirming that your invention is eligible for patent protection, e.g., not merely an abstract…

Read More →

Avoiding the “Un-patentable Abstract Idea”

INTRODUCTION: I have written many times of the ambiguity created by the courts in the Alice and Mayo decisions regarding what is patentable subject matter.  I am today suggesting a method of “avoiding the un-patentable abstract idea”. What I am referring to is the rejection of patentable innovations on the basis that the patent is merely claiming an abstract idea.  An abstract idea…

Read More →

When is Computer Software Patentable?

Software is patentable when and if it can meet the following two part test: Does the claim recite (expressly state or inherently infer) that the software pertains to a method of organizing human activity (including satisfying legal obligations), mathematical formulas or mental processes?  If no, then the software claim is patent eligible.  If yes, then go to the second part…

Read More →

Clarifying What are Patent Ineligible Abstract Ideas

Introduction: Intertwined with the long ambiguity of the scope of patent eligible software has been the difficulty in defining what are patent ineligible “abstract ideas”.  Recall 35 U.S.C. Section 101 states that all things invented by man are patentable subject matter except laws of nature, natural phenomena or abstract ideas.  These three items are referred to below as…

Read More →

Review of CBM Procedure

Introduction I very recently wrote an article regarding the use of the Covered Business Method review procedure created under the AIA of 2012.  The Covered Business Method review procedure is a powerful tool that can be used to challenge an issued patent that pertains to a business method.  See Junk Patents and Covered Business Methods.  The…

Read More →

Junk Patents and Computer Business Methods

Introduction I have written several posts pertaining to USPTO procedures intended to correct the issuance “junk patents”.  By junk patents, I mean patents issued for claimed developments which were, in fact, not innovative.  One often cited example are patents for computers performing tasks that have routinely been performed by individuals in business or commerce, i.e., computer business…

Read More →